At literally all research institutions throughout the world, native and non-native English speaking researchers are challenged when editing grant proposals, academic articles, and other scholarly works. Editing is especially time consuming, collectively taking millions of hours away from research and teaching efforts each year.
Both Grammarly and Rubriq offer AI-based digital editing solutions for institutional researchers, but which service is better for academic disciplines?
We uploaded identical academic papers from across science and engineering into Rubriq and Grammarly and recorded the results. We found the Rubriq bested Grammarly in all three categories studied: actionable edits, thoroughness, and phrasal improvement.
Our superior Rubriq writing assistant tool offers institutional licensing to:
Actionable edits defined: Will the writer, after reviewing edits and markups, understand what actionable changes should be made to improve their paper? This is especially crucial for nonnative English-language speakers.
Grammarly marked sentences as unclear, denoted by the blue underlined words in the excerpt below. Vague suggestions such as this provide authors no actionable help for improvement. This can be especially frustrating for researchers who speak English as a foreign language.
Rubriq, however, made specific edits to improve phrasing and word usage, making it more helpful and inclusive to the broader research community. This excerpt from a civil engineering paper illustrates.
Thoroughness defined: Did either of the tools thoroughly identify unclear or erroneous sentences within technical, field-specific writing? One of the main criticisms often leveled at general AI editing tools like Grammarly is that they are unable to adjust field-specific language nuances.
Among all the scientific papers tested, there were instances where Grammarly missed opportunities to flag unclear sentences or field-specific errors.
Rubriq, however, flagged those field-specific errors. This highlighted excerpt illustrates.
Phrasal Improvement defined: How thorough were each of the editing tools’ suggestions? Did they make phrasal improvements across individual phrases or across entire sentences?
Grammarly focused on changing words and phrases in isolated sections of the sentence.
Rubriq made more holistic changes to sentences, providing overall phrasal improvement, as shown below in this pediatrics paper.
Rubriq, AJE's digital editing and writing assistant tool, is superior to Grammarly in academic and research settings, particularly in the sciences and engineering.
Hundreds of editors with advanced degrees across hundreds of disciplines helped train this powerful Rubriq tool. Using proprietary AI-based technology trained by millions of human edits to academic papers covering nearly 450 areas of study, we’ve developed a product that provides:
Contact businessdevelopment@researchsquare.com to learn more and set up a free digital editing trial for your entire research group or institution.